Accordingly, in the Decision the appellant was referred to as the “Registered Proprietor” and the respondent was referred to as “the Applicant”. The application was filed on the basis that the appellant’s TM was confusingly similar to the respondent’s trade mark (Trade Mark No: 2605137) (“the respondent’s TM”) which had been registered earlier. That Decision followed on the respondent’s application to the Registrar, on 30 June 2015, to have the appellant’s TM declared invalid under the provisions of sections 5(2)(b) and 47(2)(a) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (“the TMA 1994”). This is an appeal against the decision of a hearing officer (“the HO”) of the Registrar of Trade Marks (“the Registrar”), dated 1 November 2016 (the “Decision”), that the appellant’s UK Trade Mark No 3085823 (“the appellant’s TM”) was invalid. Respondent and Applicant: Tariq Burness Paull LLP In the appeal under section 76 of the Trade Marks Act 1994 ofĪppellant and Registered Proprietor: Pickard MacRoberts LLP Dealing With a Deceased's Estate Guidance NotesĬCHG LIMITED T/A VAPORIZED AGAINST VAPOURIZ LIMITED.Simplified Divorce and Dissolution of Civil Partnership Guidance Notes.AC Messenger-at Arms and Sheriff Officers.Criminal Courts Practice Notes and Directions.Procedures and practices which apply to courts.Only judgments of significant points of law or public interest.Divorce and Dissolution of Civil Partnership.Dealing With a Deceased’s Estate in Scotland.Information on how some court processes work and action you may want to take.Information for those due to attend or visit court.Preliminary Hearings and Dates of Inquiry.Courts, tribunals and Justice organisations in Scotland.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |